Feature Articles
Author: Chris McMorran
Keywords: Environmental Studies, Experiential Learning, Geography, Japan, Northeast Asia, Study Tours
How to Cite: McMorran, C. (2014) “How "Green" Is Japan?: Studying Environmental Issues in the Field”, Education About Asia. 19(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.65959/eaa.1238
There is no shared definition of what makes a country, business, or person “green” or environmentally friendly. However, based upon its landscape, policies, technologies, and practices, Japan appears to be more eco-friendly than most nations. Approximately 70 percent of Japan is forested—a much higher percentage than other countries. It has a history of celebrating nature in the arts, from landscape gardens and flower arrangement to the haiku of Basho and anime of Hayao Miyazaki. (note 1) Japanese corporations lead the world in green technologies such as hybrid automobiles, while both citizens and the state have endeavored to clean up polluted skies and waterways, reduce greenhouse emissions, and adopt the three Rs (reduce, reuse, recycle). (note 2) However, any impression of Japan as green is complicated by its complex history of deforestation, deadly industrial pollution, rampant consumerism, wasteful state infrastructure projects, controversial stance on whaling, and reliance on imported fossil fuels. (note 3) How green is Japan? Like many nations, Japan struggles to balance economic growth and environmental protection. Unlike many nations, however, it has the affluence and motivation to develop eco-friendly policies, technologies, and practices. With so much complexity over what it means to be green, so much excellent scholarship on environmental issues in Japan, and so much that can be learned on the ground, Japan’s environmental initiatives are a rich topic for field study in the humanities, social sciences, engineering, or physical sciences courses. In this article, I reflect on three years of leading a field study course on environmental sustainability in Japan. I explain the course’s objectives and preparation, then highlight three assignments that allow students to observe and critically analyze Japan’s claims of environmental sustainability, as well as their own role in environmental protection. Course objectives Field Studies in Japan is an intensive course designed for second and third-year undergraduates. The objectives are to expose students to the complexity of environmental initiatives in Japan and introduce them to field-based research techniques. Overall, the course complicates impressions of Japan as a green nation, while highlighting the difficulty all nations face balancing economic growth and environmental protection. The course focuses on Japan’s rapid post-World War II economic growth, often called an “economic miracle.” Increased industrial output, widespread domestic consumption, and eventually surging exports turned corporations like Sony, Panasonic, and Toyota into global household names. By the early 1970s, just a generation after defeat in World War II, the Japanese enjoyed one of the world’s highest living standards, with high salaries, excellent education and work opportunities, long lifespans, and modern conveniences. Viewed through an environmental lens in particular locations, however, this “miraculous” growth is more problematic. Industrial pollution in the 1950s and ‘60s damaged air and water quality, killed hundreds of people, and permanently scarred communities. Increased household consumption continues to strain landfills and waste incinerators, while state infrastructure projects aimed at restarting the struggling economy in the 1990s served only to blanket previously pristine landscapes in expensive concrete. Today, Japan continues to struggle to balance economic growth and environmental protection. Field study in Japan allows students to witness the nation’s green efforts in context and reflect on the environmental sustainability of both Japan and their daily lives. Planning the itinerary In addition to the usual course preparation (objectives, readings, assessments), a field study requires choosing an itinerary that matches course objectives, creating a budget, requesting funds to reduce costs (if possible), and recruiting participants. Those without experience or contacts in Japan may find making an itinerary especially intimidating. For a course on environmental sustainability, I suggest visits with government agencies and businesses, as well as exchange experiences with a host family, school, or other group. This allows students to learn about environmental policies, green technologies or production methods, and everyday eco-friendly practices and attitudes. For the government’s perspective, I suggest visiting one of Japan’s 13 Eco-Model Cities, recognized in 2009 by the government for their efforts to reduce carbon emissions and implement other eco-friendly plans.4 We visited the Eco-Model City of Minamata, which was also one of the most notorious sites of pollution during Japan’s period of rapid economic growth and the namesake of the methyl mercury poisoning known as Minamata disease. At a visit to city hall, an employee explained the city’s polluted history, as well as initiatives to become green, like sorting waste into over twenty categories. For a business’s perspective, I suggest a factory tour. Companies like Toyota and Honda offer tours that describe their efforts to implement greener technologies and develop greener products. We did the Minamata factory tour at a plant that recycles glass, paper, and electronics. The company owner explained the life cycle of most products, which move from natural resources to waste. He then explained his company’s role in seeing waste as a potential resource to be profitably reinserted in the consumption cycle. Among other things, my students saw a disassembly line of glass bottles being cleaned and inspected, so they could be returned to distilleries and filled with sake. As I later explain, other companies, even theme parks, offer tours highlighting their green efforts that allow students to witness the green claims of companies for themselves. Finally, for the perspective of ordinary citizens, I suggest an exchange opportunity like a homestay, farmstay, or visit to a school—any of which expose students to how the average Japanese person receives green policies and products and how they protect the environment. Students can also observe whether the fact that some people perceive eco-friendliness and not others is due to factors such as age or gender. My students stayed two nights each in both a homestay and a farmstay.5 In the latter, students helped with weeding and planting vegetables, a first for many and an opportunity to learn about organic farming and farmstays as a form of ecotourism.
The locals tell us that . . . trees are continually grafted to grow new trees to replace the ones felled for wood. This scenario strikes me as one in which humans become implicated as an inseparable part in the entire system of the life cycle. Somehow I think of it not as an attempt to appropriate nature but a kind of relationship between those cutting trees and the trees bounded by a contract of renewing life.The best notebooks move beyond description and provide a forum for students to reflect on what sustainability means to them. Six months after each field study, I send students an online follow- up survey about their learning experience, including the field notebook. One student called the process “tedious,” but all of them acknowledged its learning value. C.A., second-year female Japanese studies major, noted, “One can never know when some form of genius or revelation might spring forth,” while M.T., a third-year female geography major, added:
Writing field notes . . . really assisted my learning. Jotting down thoughts and observations as they came and writing them down properly at the end of the day was great as well, as I ended up doing much processing and consolidation of these thoughts/observations in writing the proper field notes.Field-based learning: Mapping One useful exercise that builds on students’ skills of observation and reflection is mapping. Maps are curious tools. They are often considered authoritative, such as when marking national borders. They are also essential when planning a field trip, and maps help students navigate unfamiliar field locations. However, maps are also biased, partial representations of the world. When students understand this, they realize that maps can be tools to analyze the validity of existing representations and depict new information. Using maps requires students to observe their surroundings and critically reflect on what they see versus what is depicted on the map.
Using maps requires students to observe their surroundings and critically reflect on what they see versus what is depicted on the map.