Online Supplement
Author: Rachel M. Ball-Phillips
Keywords: Anthropology, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, South Asia, World History
How to Cite: M. Ball-Phillips, R. (2019) “South Asia in World History (New Oxford World History): Reviewed by Rachel Ball-Phillips”, Education About Asia. 24(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.65959/eaa.1581

The most effective technique used in South Asia in World History is resituating South Asia’s early history of empires. For example, he sets some of the early Indian empires, such as the Mauryan, in a global context. When he moves to the Delhi Sultanates and the Mughal Empire, he situates them within the broader Islamic world. With the Portuguese entrance into India, Gilbert paints a picture of a global and diverse world in Calicut. By the nineteenth century, nationalisms are situated within a global context with references to “home rule” in Ireland and the Indian National Congress as a prototype for the African Nationalist Congress in South Africa. There are some useful resources for educators in South Asia in World History. One of the most frequent complaints I hear from students is a dearth of maps to situate them geographically. South Asia in World History has several useful maps, particularly those that highlight trade and connections. Another helpful resource in this book is the “Website” section, which provides websites and explanations of resources available on each site. This is a useful tool for K–12 educators, as well as those who teach survey courses at the college level. Visual resources are pedagogically important when teaching about South Asia, a place many of our students have a hard time imagining within the confines of the American classroom. While world historians eager for a narrativedriven history will appreciate this work, South Asian specialists may be disappointed. The case in point is Gilbert’s treatment of Gandhi and the Gandhian philosophy. Beginning with Jainism and the ideas of ahimsa (nonviolence), he follows this through to the Gandhian narrative of Indian nationalism and independence—though Gandhi is misspelled as “Ghandi” several times throughout the book. While this works as a tool to create connections, it also limits the voices of other non-elite men and women who have become a significant part of South Asian historiography. The influence that gender and dalit (untouchable) histories have had on South Asian history over the past few decades are missing from Gilbert’s narrative. A stronger grounding in recent South Asian histories would have given the book a more nuanced approach that reflects the current state of the field. Shortcomings aside, the project of New Oxford World History is an exciting new experiment in the writing of world history. It is an important move away from Eurocentric narratives. South Asia in the World moves beyond Eurocentricism, even if it has serious limitations within South Asian historiography. It is a useful resource, although it should not be taught as a standalone text. To use it in a classroom setting, it would need to be tempered with other texts and/or primary sources that tell the stories of women, dalits, and political movements of the left and right that posed serious changes to the status quo.Marc Jason Gilbert’s South Asia in World History is an attempt to bring South Asian history into a broader global history.