Columns
Author: Philip C. Brown
Keywords: American History, International Relations, Japan, Northeast Asia, Political Science, United States, World History
How to Cite: C. Brown, P. (1999) “The Japanese Discovery of America: A Brief History with Documents”, Education About Asia. 4(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.65959/eaa.255
Although emphasizing the Japanese perspective, there are a number of items from American authors, including actors in the “opening” of Japan, American observers of the two major Japanese missions to the United States, and the American press. About one-fourth of the documents present an American perspective. On balance, Duus has selected from a broad array of perspectives, and he includes a number of items in English translation for the first time. In a slender volume like this no editor can be comprehensive, and there are lacunae. While a couple of documents raise the issue of coastal defense, they do so in the context of political advocacy. There are no documents that present the ground-level efforts to strengthen coastal defenses in the 1850s to 1870s. Efforts by diverse political authorities—Shōgun, daimyō, and the early Meiji government—were implemented in rural communities removed from the immediate coastline and proximity to treaty ports. (I have in mind here materials indexed in manuscript collections for Iwate village and other communities inland from the coast of southern-central Echigo, modern Niigata prefecture.) Such mobilization was more significant in communicating to commoners a nation-wide sense of danger and urgency than the urban-oriented publication of broadsheets. I wonder as well about the absence of any reaction to military attacks by Europeans as Japanese thought about how to respond to Americans. Instructors preparing to use this book may want to look at additional materials to flesh out their own understanding of such issues. Duus’s introduction to the era, “Part I: The Japanese Discovery of America,” does attempt to be more comprehensive. It is well written and filled with useful background that will help student and instructor alike. It does seem to me that Duus struggles to incorporate recent scholarship on the seventeenth century reactions of Japan to the West. While seeming to accept Ronald Toby’s criticism of past scholarship as Eurocentric (State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu) and noting that Japan continued to trade with its Asian neighbors (“The anti-Christian policies of the bakufu were not intended to cut Japan completely off from the rest of the world,” p. 5), Duus nonetheless repeatedly refers to pre-Perry Japanese foreign policy as “isolation,” losing the nuance of a policy based on anti-Christian missionary intent. The introduction raises a number of useful issues for students to think about. In particular, I like the efforts to give information on the scope of experience of particular observers and the limits of their perspectives. Discussion of the views of observers whose work is not included in the collection of documents may also have some utility, helping students to think about the degree to which the documentary material is representative of specific segments of official and public reaction to the arrival of Americans and their European brethren. Nonetheless, I wonder if this introduction, like the introductions to sections, chapters, and individual documents in Tsunoda and Lu, doesn’t go so far as to interfere with one of the principle benefits (from my perspective) of using documentary collections: to give students a chance to “discover” history on their own, to develop their own ability to think critically about documentary evidence, its limitations, its uses, and to struggle with the problems of creating a thoughtful narrative and well-reasoned analysis. In the case of Tsunoda and Lu, the introductions effectively tell students what they will find in the document. In my experience in teaching both at high school and college levels, students tend to read introductions and not the documents. Duus’s introduction to the whole collection frequently links his analysis to specific translated documents that follow. The introductions to individual documents suffer less from this problem than I think is the case with Tsunoda and Lu. Nonetheless, since one of Duus’s purposes is clearly that “these documents . . . remind readers of how difficult it is to comprehend a totally unfamiliar culture” (vii), and since that message does come through quite clearly in the documents, I wonder if the effort to incorporate the documents’ main points in the general introduction limits the ability of students to “discover” on their own. This is a very useful book, and Duus has moved beyond the standard scope of previous conceptions of what collections of Japanese documents have been. I have expressed some caveats above, but I intend to try this book in our department’s gateway course for history majors, which focuses on elements of historical method. While I may not have students read the introduction, the subject of early American contact with Japan and the “curious” nature of the documents will appeal, I think, even to students with no particular background in Japanese history.This is a very useful book, and Duus has moved beyond the standard scope of previous conceptions of what collections of Japanese documents have been.